Methods
I never really thought of blogging this down but it might help me as time goes along...
One of my greatest challenges at work is trying to convince parents and even some teachers that the methods of intervention we propose for our student with autism is the 'appropriate' or even most 'suitable' one. For the longest time, i myself didnt have much clarity on what exactly is the right intervention methods, being new to the job. My basic training back in university when working with children with autism is using the ABA methods, and for the longest time, it was the prevailing method of choice in terms of intervention. But when i started working, i realized that there are a lot of alternative methods as well as 'treatments' out there for the autistic population.
Autism is a tricky diagnosis. No one really knows where it comes from exactly... which genes... which triggers.. even how it affects each individual is different on the autistic spectrum. I guess ABA has the longest history in terms of working with children with autism, stretching all the way back to the time of Lovaas, and the method itself has been evolving as well. Then there is also sensory integration methods, sound therapy, cranial therapy, floorplay, drugs/diet therapy, even acupuncture which is now readily avaliable out there which promises a 'cure'. Then of course, there's TEACCH, the structured teaching program started 40 years ago in North carolina which i went for training in recently. From all the parents that i had worked with in the last 3 1/2 years, different parents/caregivers and teachers have sworn by different methods which they felt work for their individual child.
I am really in no position to say which is the 'RIGHT' methods and at work, we could very well opt for an eclectic approach in our service delivery. However, from past experience, it didn't worked very well, mainly because to be truly effective in having an eclectic approach, i believe we have to be well-versed in the characteristic of autism as well as the various intervention philosophy and methods. If we don't have that, it would be confusing for the child and the one delivering the services.
Personally, i have a few core beliefs in what I can do for a child with autism. I believe in individualization because as i said, different child will have different autism profile. I also believe in utilizing their strengths (in visual learning) to facilitate learning in their weaker areas (auditory processing). And most importantly, i believe in helping the child to be independent. With all these in mind, i felt what's most comfortable for me is to use the structure teaching methods whose philosophy of how they view a child with autism coincide with mine. There is no conflict of interest and i can honestly see how, when applied individually to suit each child, i am creating meaning for the child in his environment.
It was rather amazing for me when i went to North Carolina and see how the methods can work for children with different abilities. Even more so, i am just so impressed by the respect the therapist from TEACCH have for the children stemming right from their philosophy that each child is an individual, hence WE have to take the initiative to go into their world to bring them out rather than attempting to mould them by force into ours like how i see some people attempt to do.
I guess it really bores down to what the therapist or caregiver believe in and ultimately, i do respect what the parents want for their child even though i may not be able to deliver what they want because of what i believe and i am trained in. I think the only thing i can promise is that i will deliver to the best of my abilities in the method which i believe in.